Calmtude

Trump Threatens $5bn Lawsuit Over National Guard Report

· wellness

Threats to Truth: The Trump Administration’s Latest Assault on Free Speech

The Center for American Progress (Cap) has faced a $5 billion lawsuit threat from the Trump administration over its report on National Guard deployments in Washington DC, Memphis, and Los Angeles. This move is part of a pattern of behavior aimed at silencing critics and controlling the narrative.

According to Cap’s report, released on July 13th, the $1.7 billion spent on National Guard deployments had no discernible impact on crime rates in these cities. In fact, violent crime began declining before Trump took office in 2025, rendering the deployment inconsequential. The administration’s response was predictable: a thinly veiled attempt to bully Cap into retraction.

Alejandro Brito, one of Trump’s personal lawyers, sent a letter threatening suit unless Cap backed down. However, Cap refused to retract its report, citing its commitment to truth and evidence-based research. Brito’s allegations against Cap are baseless, accusing the organization of manipulating crime statistics for political gain. A closer look at the report reveals that its conclusions are based on meticulous analysis of data.

The real issue here is the administration’s attempt to silence critics and stifle free speech. As Neera Tanden, Cap’s president and CEO, noted, “A lawsuit is a transparent attempt to silence us.” This latest development raises questions about the administration’s motives and the role of think tanks like Cap in holding those in power accountable.

Cap is one of Washington’s leading liberal voices, founded by John Podesta, former Clinton White House chief of staff and chair of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign. Its report highlights the administration’s failure to deliver on its promises. This case also echoes a wider trend: the Trump administration’s ongoing assault on truth and evidence-based research.

Whether it’s climate change, healthcare, or social issues, this administration has shown a disturbing willingness to disregard facts in favor of ideology. Cap’s report is just another example of the dangers of politicizing science and data. As we move forward, one thing becomes clear: the Trump administration will stop at nothing to maintain its grip on power. The real question is whether our institutions, including the judiciary, will stand firm against these attacks on free speech and truth.

Reader Views

  • AN
    Alex N. · habit coach

    The Trump administration's latest attempt to bully critics into silence is just another chapter in its ongoing assault on truth and accountability. What's striking here is how this lawsuit threat echoes the White House's broader strategy of demonizing think tanks like Cap for doing their job: holding those in power accountable through rigorous research and analysis. By attempting to silence voices like Neera Tanden, Trump is not just silencing a single critic, but threatening the very foundation of fact-based governance – the freedom to speak truth to power without fear of retribution.

  • DM
    Dr. Maya O. · behavioral researcher

    The Trump administration's lawsuit threat against the Center for American Progress is a blatant attempt to discredit and intimidate critics. What's often overlooked in this narrative is the chilling effect on academic research. Think tanks like Cap rely on funding from foundations and philanthropists who expect rigorous analysis, not advocacy masquerading as fact. If the administration succeeds in silencing Cap, it won't just be a blow to free speech – it will also undermine trust in evidence-based research itself, a cornerstone of democratic governance.

  • TC
    The Calm Desk · editorial

    The Trump administration's attempt to silence critics through lawsuits is nothing new, but this latest threat takes the cake. What's striking about this case is that Cap's report was based on publicly available data and independent analysis. By trying to discredit their methods, the administration is merely attempting to distract from its own failure to deliver on promised reforms. The real question is: will other think tanks be intimidated into silence, or will they stand firm in their commitment to truth and transparency?

Related articles

More from Calmtude

View as Web Story →